Search for: "Philip Bullock" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2008, 3:17 pm
For those of you following the ongoing saga of the $28 billion punitive damages award in Bullock v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:05 am
For further posts on this case, see our original post about the Bullock opinion, our follow-up post about the impact of Bullock on the CACI punitive damages instructions, and our follow-up post about the use of remittitur to cure legal error. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 4:52 pm
Contrary to the arguments of Bullock and her amici, Philip Morris was not required to include in its instruction a statement that the jury could consider harm to others in evaluating the reprehensibility of the conduct that harmed Bullock. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:45 am by Julia Zebley
Philip Morris argued that the punitive judgment should simply match the judgment for pain and suffering, $850,000, as Bullock's health was mitigated by her conduct. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
The California Court of Appeals recently issued its decision in Bullock v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 12:24 am
Bullock's lawyer, Michael Piuze, told jurors Philip Morris misrepresented the risks of smoking for 50 years. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 10:28 am
The Bullock court outlines the usual use of a remittitur to cure an award that is flawed simply because it is just too high in light of the evidence. [read post]